2 typo
source | link

The Google Certification Practices Statement (available here) indicates the CA follows the CA/Browser Forum Baseline but does not mention the Extended Validation Guidelines.

Moreover it is specified that the Google CA may issue wildcard certificates (and does, google.com, youtube.com, android.com are using wildcard certificates) issue wildcard certificates which is not allowed for EV certificates. Therefore Google should amend the CP and CPS if she decides the issue EV certificates.

The Google Certification Practices Statement (available here) indicates the CA follows the CA/Browser Forum Baseline but does not mention the Extended Validation Guidelines.

Moreover it is specified that the Google CA may (and does, google.com, youtube.com, android.com are wildcard certificates) issue wildcard certificates which is not allowed for EV certificates. Therefore Google should amend the CP and CPS if she decides the issue EV certificates.

The Google Certification Practices Statement (available here) indicates the CA follows the CA/Browser Forum Baseline but does not mention the Extended Validation Guidelines.

Moreover it is specified that the Google CA may issue wildcard certificates (and does, google.com, youtube.com, android.com are using wildcard certificates) which is not allowed for EV certificates. Therefore Google should amend the CP and CPS if she decides the issue EV certificates.

1
source | link

The Google Certification Practices Statement (available here) indicates the CA follows the CA/Browser Forum Baseline but does not mention the Extended Validation Guidelines.

Moreover it is specified that the Google CA may (and does, google.com, youtube.com, android.com are wildcard certificates) issue wildcard certificates which is not allowed for EV certificates. Therefore Google should amend the CP and CPS if she decides the issue EV certificates.