Timeline for Avoiding Replay Attacks on Lightweight Channel
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014 at 6:09 | comment | added | miniBill | Because otherwise you cannot detect packets dropped by an attacker | |
| Jun 11, 2014 at 4:32 | vote | accept | David | ||
| Mar 13, 2014 at 8:25 | comment | added | DanielE | Why do you think is it necessary to keep track of every device's counter? | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 8:20 | comment | added | DanielE | What would you do if an ACK is missing? Send the command again with an increased counter? Then, if the ACK is droped by an attacker the server would resend the command with an increased counter and the device would do execute the command again. | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 7:57 | history | answered | miniBill | CC BY-SA 3.0 |