Timeline for Are short usernames a security concern?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 at 15:06 | answer | added | KnightHawk0811 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 24, 2015 at 7:20 | answer | added | Asen | timeline score: -1 | |
| Apr 23, 2015 at 18:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/591303081851281408 | ||
| Apr 23, 2015 at 15:27 | comment | added | WhiteWinterWolf | Long usernames is more important to limit spamming since it is where username bruteforcing would occur. [email protected] may receive more spam than [email protected], that's why some email provider require the username to be a minimum length. Apart from that, the security itself comes from the password, not the username which is a public information. | |
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:45 | history | edited | Niklas Rosencrantz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:45 | vote | accept | Niklas Rosencrantz | ||
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:30 | answer | added | S.L. Barth is on codidact.com | timeline score: 23 | |
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:29 | answer | added | LvB | timeline score: 6 | |
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:26 | history | asked | Niklas Rosencrantz | CC BY-SA 3.0 |