Timeline for Was TRESOR integrated in the Linux kernel?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 1:11 | answer | added | forest | timeline score: 9 | |
| Dec 27, 2015 at 9:47 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/681048834982678532 | ||
| Jun 12, 2015 at 19:30 | comment | added | ckujau | Do you mean this? | |
| May 26, 2015 at 15:50 | comment | added | LoukiosValentine79 | I registered to LKML (I can see now the many-many mails from it flowing in my inbox), sent an e-mail about this topic, but I cannot see that it got posted in reality to the list. What am I missing? | |
| May 22, 2015 at 21:46 | comment | added | ckujau | TRESOR wasn't even discussed on lkml and no related commit can be found. So, even though the patches are licensed as GPL, nobody proposed to push them upstream. | |
| May 18, 2015 at 15:17 | history | edited | LoukiosValentine79 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| May 15, 2015 at 18:14 | comment | added | S.L. Barth is on codidact.com | Welcome to Information Security Stack Exchange! I have edited your question. I believe it explains the question better. If you disagree with my (rather extensive) edit, you can roll it back. To roll it back, click on the "edited ... ago" link. That takes you to the edit history page where you can do rollbacks. | |
| May 15, 2015 at 18:12 | history | edited | S.L. Barth is on codidact.com | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Big re-arrangement of the question. Giving it an introduction and more in-depth explanation.
|
| May 15, 2015 at 9:03 | review | First posts | |||
| May 15, 2015 at 9:09 | |||||
| May 15, 2015 at 9:03 | history | asked | LoukiosValentine79 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |