4 added 1 character in body
source | link

For backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was one week ago, those files created in one week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not-backed- up photos are involved, most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. After all, in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall Windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be too lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to youyour network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is safe from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

For backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was one week ago, those files created in one week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not-backed- up photos are involved, most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. After all, in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall Windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be too lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is safe from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

For backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was one week ago, those files created in one week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not-backed- up photos are involved, most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. After all, in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall Windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be too lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to your network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is safe from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

3 Copy edited (e.g. ref. <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/afterall>).
source | link

For Backupsbackups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was 1one week ago, those files created in 1one week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not backed-backed- up photos are involved, most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. AfterallAfter all, in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall windowsWindows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be totoo lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is savesafe from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

For Backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was 1 week ago, those files created in 1 week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not backed up photos are involved most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. Afterall in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be to lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is save from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

For backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was one week ago, those files created in one week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not-backed- up photos are involved, most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. After all, in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall Windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be too lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is safe from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

2 added 59 characters in body
source | link

For Backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was 1 week ago, those files created in 1 week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not backed up photos are involved most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. Afterall in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be to lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is save from most exploits andor users knowwere told what to avoid.

For Backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was 1 week ago, those files created in 1 week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not backed up photos are involved most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. Afterall in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be to lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is save from most exploits and users know what to avoid.

For Backups to be useful you have to do them regularily. If you work on your computer and your last backup was 1 week ago, those files created in 1 week may already be worth 50-100$/€ whatever the attacker demands. And if not backed up photos are involved most are even more willing to pay. This makes this kind of attack quite profitable.

Most people have no clue about computers. They are just plain simple users, with little knowledge of what to avoid or what could go wrong. Afterall in most cases when you have a virus or a rootkit, you will know someone who can help you out, save your files, format your computer and reinstall windows for you. That means for those users the attack comes out of nowhere and they are just unprepared.

And people are also lazy. Even if they knew that backups are useful, most would be to lazy to connect their computer to an external drive periodically. And most wouldn't really know how to do it, besides pulling all files they like manually onto the drive. In which case they could easily miss some or copy so many files that the process gets tedious over time.

Also if your backups are connected to you network/computer they may simply be vulnerable as well, because you are expecting a disk failure, but you think that your network/computer generally is save from most exploits or users were told what to avoid.

1
source | link