I have seen several offices with electric locks for entry that have a sensor for exit. I assume it's some kind of motion or object detection sensor.

Egress sensor

This is odd because in many cases, there's a seam between the door it is monitoring and the other door or wall. What does that sensor actually do, and how does it prevent someone from pushing a small thing in the crack and changing it to (try to) trick the sensor?

I once tried poking a piece of cardboard on a stick through the seam, turning it sideways, and waving it around. That didn't work, which is a good sign, but maybe my stick just wasn't long enough. I'm still concerned about the security of these systems.

  • 3
    I think it's IR so you need something warm. It unlocks the door so you can exit without having to push a latch. Jan 29, 2016 at 23:53
  • 2
    There is an post on this at warroom.securestate.com/request-exit-sensor-bypass - the sensor looks exactly like the one you have posted. Add heat/cold, and you will get through. Jan 29, 2016 at 23:59
  • 1
    It's a known vulnerability. A coat hanger, a sheet of cardboard, and some hand warming gel will trigger the unlock.
    – schroeder
    Jan 30, 2016 at 0:38
  • 3
    @Dogeatcatworld - If you summarize what's on that page in an answer, I'd upvote it. Jan 30, 2016 at 2:09
  • I've heard of that trick with a warm rag on a stick being used. Jan 30, 2016 at 15:16

2 Answers 2


What does that sensor actually do, and how does it prevent someone from pushing a small thing in the crack and changing it to (try to) trick the sensor?

This sensor is called a REX or Request to Exit. The sensor is meant to allow people to leave an area without having to badge or authenticate leaving the area. Your question is good because the idea of pushing something through and attempting to trigger the REX is something that has been accounted for. The devices can be configured to only test a certain range, such as 4 feet from the top of the door.

The best practice is to have the REX aimed at the door handle so that it triggers when someone is actually trying to leave the area, but having the range configured so it should not trigger if someone is trying to stuff something under the door. Newer sensors often utilize IR to ensure that it is not an inanimate object, but a person trying to leave the area.

The combination of having a properly configured REX as well as IR sensors in the REX reduces the likelihood of a vulnerability and increases the odds that the door can only be opened when someone is on the inside attempting to leave.

  • 1
    I still say: coat hanger, piece of paper, and some hand warming gel ...
    – schroeder
    Mar 9, 2016 at 17:43
  • @schroeder I haven't done this with a REX, but I have used a fish tape to pull a handle door. I would be more inclined to say you would need something long enough to get inside the configured range and a coat hanger may not do it. I agree with your method but I would use something longer. I also do not know the size that is required by the IR sensor on the REX, so it may need to be something wider than a metal wire.
    – Danny K
    Mar 9, 2016 at 17:58
  • 1
    This seems like an extremely good example of developing something very high tech where a simple solution already exists. Why does anyone use this ridiculous and error prone solution when all you really need to do is test whether someone is twisting the door nob from the inside? That can be as simple as a switch inside the doornob. (And in fact that's how the doors where I work work). Mar 9, 2016 at 18:45
  • @SteveSether, these can be used to disarm an audible alarm, to distinguish between a human on the inside vs. a burglar manipulating a fishtape opening the door from the outside. They aren't always just wired to activate an electronic lock to release the door. Nov 8, 2016 at 21:28

Be forewarned, electric locks and door exits are part of building codes and I would advise to seek a experienced professional or architect to assist in any questions or concerns you may have with your particular installation/operation.

The request to exit device may not even be necessary or necessary to unlock the electric hardware unless you are using a maglock which in my opinion should be avoided when feasibly possible especially if the doorway has a exit sign above the door. The request to exit device in my opinion is primarily used to notify the access control system that someone is exiting versus forcing their way in without using a card reader or similar electronic security device to gain valid entry. But if using a maglock the request to exit device is now more importantly used to additionally release the maglock in a false safe manner and independent of anything else such as a access control system.

Therefore why even have the request to exit device trigger the access control panel to unlock the electric lock if you are not even using a maglock. Maglocks or similar electric locks generally require additional fire safety and life safety devices break electrical connections in order to exit. With electric strikes, electric trim levers, and electric latch retraction you could use mechanical operations to exit such as found in panic bars and door handles while only using the electrical operation of the lock when needing to enter. Most access control systems have the request to exit feature trigger the unlock operation of the electric lock by default but will let you change it in programming so that that feature only validates that the door maybe opened while exiting without triggering the unlocking of the electric lock. In my opinion the access control manufactures should have the request to exit device not trigger their unlock procedure by default and only validate the door about to be opened.

I should also mention that there are other types of request to exit devices that seem to detect better than motion detectors without the problem posed in this discussion but may not be as durable/reliable or as easy to install/maintain. Request to exit devices that use micro switches built in to panic bars and door handles or other mechanisms that require direct movement/touch will avoid the common problem I have commonly ran into which is false forced entry alarms on card access systems.

But my guess is that the original poster has one or two of those heavy glass doors using a maglock for electronic access in place of or in addition to the original key cylinder at the bottom of the door to throw a bolt into the floor or maybe something along those lines. In those cases it seems you realistically can't avoid using anything but a motion detector as your primary "no prior knowledge" device and a push button with 30 second timer as your secondary "back up" device in addition to having the maglock release during a fire.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .