1

I am going through the IASME cyber essentials questionnaire and one of the questions is

are all sensitive assets identified (eg protective marking) and properly protected?

I have googled protective marking which refers to the governments level of classification (Top secret, secret etc).

My question is would small businesses use these same classifications or would they simply just state that something is confidential? also, are there other ways to identify sensitive assets?

Sorry if this question is very basic, I am just a little confused on this question. Thank you for any help in advance.

1
  • I suspect that in this case they're using "sensitive assets" in the specific sense of "data requiring protective markings/handling" - I think there is another question about "personal data assets". If so, there are specific terms used for the classifications, which don't apply for other data. – Matthew Feb 13 '17 at 10:09
1

The government uses C, S, and TS as the general material level restriction, but to think that's all they use would be a gross over simplification. Other things in play are "Need to Know" policies -- basically, just because you have TS clearance doesn't mean you get to access everything marked TS. There are far too many to list here, but basically it means that you end up with a greater level of complexity than a simple three marking system.

As for small businesses, classify information based on potential damage if released to the public. Would the firm be embarrassed? Would their competitors gain insight into how they run their company? Is it a secret formula that is behind the entire company? You must also consider legal repercussions from releasing protected information (medical records, etc).

So, the answer your question: companies usually must have at least a confidential level to protect employee information. There is nothing to stop a company that feels it needs additional categories from making them. In every day life however, most firms forgo the "C/S/TS" idea and just use compartments of information.

For example, Apple may not classify their employees in levels of trust (they may, I have no idea), but they certainly compartmentalize project information to only the needed departments.

Think of the government's method on one end of the spectrum and a mafia's "web of trust" on the other. There is more than one way to skin a cat. A company is going to pick the one with the "hopefully" best risk-to-reward.

1
  • 1
    Thank you very much for this detailed answer, this is what I was looking for. – Anonymous5642 Feb 16 '17 at 13:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.