The Reverse DNS PTR-records (or Pointer Records, or Reverse Record) are often incorrect. Like pointing to:

  1. the domain of a hosting provider;
  2. a non-existing domain.

Let's say I have example.com hosted on IP But the PTR record of points to stackexchange.com.

Now, when I send email from using @example.com email addresses, a "better" SPAM filter will notice that the PTR record points to stackexchange.com instead of example.com and give my email a higher SPAM score.

But, does the fact that a PTR-record is incorrect anyhow introduce another security risk for example.com or stackexchange.com?


There's rather a lot of preconceptions here.

the domain of a hosting provider

...does not mean that the PTR record is wrong. An IP address can have multiple names associated with it (either directly in A records or indirectly via CNAME records) but a PTR can only have one name.

a "better" SPAM filter will notice

No, a better Spam filter will check the SPF record to see if is a legitimate sender for example.com, and if it proves not to be, then give your email a higher Spam score.

A lot of the added processing implemented around UBE is not based on agreed standards (SPF is a notable exception) hence a lot of solutions are rather badly designed/implemented. A lot of them also rely on not disclosing the criteria by which they differentiate between good and bad requests.

Hence a PTR record which doesn't close the loop with the A record should not have an adverse impact, it may do in practice.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.