I am currently investigation effectiveness of Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems that are backed my Machine Learning rather than traditional Signature based detection mechanisms, so that the system learns from anomalies in the network.

I have come across several studies (research papers and forum posts over several years) that look into this in terms of a Mathematical/Statistical point of view to highlight the effectiveness of an AI based IDS. I need to highlight the same from a technical standpoint, using the tools and results to compare the performance of AI based mechanisms.

Through Netresec and Secrepo, I have access to publicly available packet captures of malicious network activities.

I have also looked into AIEngine (https://bitbucket.org/camp0/aiengine) and Stratosphere IPS (https://stratosphereips.org/) to help me with the same. But I have not been able to succeed in this. (It could also be that I have approached them incorrectly. Advise from experience is appreciated)

I would highly appreciate suggestions of IDS/IPS that uses Machine Learning to detect anomalies. What I essentially need is an ML based System to carry out the analysis and compare the results of the same packets against a signature based IDS that are unable to find certain attacks.

Like many other academic papers, I have also had literature from several years of research to show that AI based mechanisms are theoretically better. But I need to prove the real world effectiveness of these models/proposals for which I would require IPS/IDS that employ Machine Learning.


closed as off-topic by schroeder May 28 '17 at 21:14

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • spot.incubator.apache.org (Apache Spot), Hortonworks Cybersecurity Suite (HCP, Apache Metron), and Sqrrl are a few machine-learning platforms that can interact with TCP/IP network data, but these are more-focused on beaconing, fumbling, etc. The ones you mentioned take a different approach and are equally-valid! Thank you – atdre Oct 17 '17 at 17:04