0

I know water mark the photograph is one method to protect ones copyright over the picture. is there any other technique through which one can prevent or detect the plagiarism of photos.

closed as too broad by S.L. Barth - Reinstate Monica, Steve, Steffen Ullrich, Serge Ballesta, Rory Alsop Oct 11 '17 at 15:54

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 4
    As is, your question is pretty vague. What do you expect of a 'protection mechanism'? Do you wan to assess proof of ownership for exact copies, modifications and derivative works, what kind of modifications? What kind of watermarking are you expecting, visible or invisible? Watermarking is a complicated matter and depends a lot on the use case. – M'vy Oct 10 '17 at 8:43
  • i edited your tags to be more specific - if you search those tags here, you will see a lot of options – schroeder Oct 10 '17 at 8:43
  • Watermarking is not one method but many of them. You can add hidden marks which are detected by crawling the whole internet for pictures, or you can put visible mark to say that it's copyrighted material. – Aria Oct 10 '17 at 8:58
1

There's not any fool proof way. If you upload or host a photograph on a server and it's accessible by users or it's accessible by anyone with an internet connection the content becomes fair game for anyone to take/reuse/re-upload/edit/copy.

Here are some mechanisms that certainly slowdown people form misusing your content:

  • Watermarking (as you mentioned)

  • Stenography can be used to hide information in the photo that lets you do an image search via google's image search and always find instances of your photo, then you can ask the user to remove the misused content.

  • Preventing users from taking screenshots (poor form and i.e only)

  • Preventing users from right-clicking image

  • 1
    Forget steganography. Steganography is not a security feature, its goal is to make information statistically hidden in a collection of images, so that there is no efficient way to distinguish which image contains information and which does not other than running the decoding process (which is time consuming). – M'vy Oct 10 '17 at 15:06
  • That's the point. One must hide the information so that others do not know it's in the image. Once you encode the content you should be able search for it based on your encoding method, much like i mentioned in the answer. I will say that it's REALLY out of the way and very similar to a hidden watermark. This is what movie agencies use on movies they give to critics for advanced screening and if they movie is leaked they will know exactly who leaked the content as it is singed with a digital signature iirc. – car Oct 10 '17 at 15:51
  • 1
    There is a critical difference about watermarks and steganography. Steganography aims at reducing the amount of (statistical) alteration made to the image so that one cannot infer the presence of the mark. Whereas in watermarking, the goal is to have a resistant mark to be able to maintain proof of ownership over modifications of the media. This goal is not compatible with the goal of steganography. Obviously the two techniques share some concept, but they are not the same. – M'vy Oct 11 '17 at 8:51
  • You've said the same thing twice. With Stenography you sign the image with information. Someone misuses the information and climes the the work as their own. To prove ownership you decode the hidden message, or show that their content does not decode properly ect. This is a simple example. The fact is that one can use all of the listed methods to help slowdown the misuse of their content and track it, which was the point of my original answer. IMHO if you have more to discus I think it's time we take this to a chat so i can make edits to my answer if need be. – car Oct 11 '17 at 12:59
  • @car I believe M'vy's point is that it is desirable for a watermark to survive changing format (eg if someone changes your watermarked png to a jpg it would ideally still be there), whereas stenography just wants to keep data hidden, and modifying something enough to survive format changes would likely make it much easier to discover. – AndrolGenhald Oct 11 '17 at 13:14

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.