As I understand, a relatively outdated phone (Android 5, not updated for a few years) could be easily compromised by using security exploits through WiFi, mobile data, NFC or Bluetooth.

I'm about to participate to an event where other people might try to hack into my phone (I suppose there is a similar issue when going to the conferences such as DEF CON). Given that NFC and Bluetooth are already turned off, is there any chance for another person to hack into my phone if I keep WiFi and mobile data turned off as well?

Naturally, physical stealing of the phone is out of question, but the intruder can get within centimeters of the phone in a crowd.

  • So, "airplane mode"?
    – schroeder
    Dec 23, 2017 at 12:19
  • 2
    I think so, although I'm not sure if airplane mode disables NFC as well. Dec 23, 2017 at 12:25
  • 1
    Would it be valid to say, even though you're not 100% safe, your phone becomes such an outlying target that it stops being interesting? Whatever attack vector that works on your phone will work on so many other phones, they just wouldn't bother with your phone...
    – Nelson
    Dec 23, 2017 at 18:59
  • 4
    An anecdote. I tend to put my iPhone into airplane mode when I am charging it (so it charges faster). Sometimes I forget, and earlier today I successfully used Apple Pay to buy something, only later realizing I was in Airplane mode. I don't know if Android Pay works in the same way, but if it's configured on the device, an attacker could potentially steal money from you by exploiting it, even in Airplane mode.
    – JMK
    Dec 23, 2017 at 20:18
  • 1
    Don't forget the other common short range radio transmission technologies: Bluetooth and NFC! Dec 23, 2017 at 20:40

3 Answers 3


By disabling WiFi and mobile data, you shut down some attack paths. That means that your system is more secure, and probably immune to most "script kiddies" attacks.

However, the telephony part will still be active. It is certainly harder to exploit, but a smartphone is far from a 1960s telephone, and even the telephony part has interaction with the phone's OS. That means that is is still possible that a combination of calls and SMS triggers an unexpected condition leading to a possible exploit. I know none of those, because even the Stagefright bug cited by @SteffenUllrich in his answer uses a crafted MMS. And a MMS can only be delivered when mobile data (or possibly WiFi) is active, and will never be if only telephony is allowed.

If you can be sure that god himself was among the engineers that designed your phone system, you are absolutely safe. In any other case, bugs are always possible...

Of course, if you use other functions of your phone like displaying photos, viewing videos, or playing music, you open new doors for attacks with every new application.

  • 2
    Don't forget about the baseband processor, which is independent of the phone's primary CPU. It facilitates access to the phone's radios and could theoretically allow some control over the phone remotely. Dec 24, 2017 at 2:19
  • You might want to mention e911.
    – forest
    Dec 24, 2017 at 5:56
  • A little bit dated, but there was the glorious Baseband Apocalypse talk from 27c3. Dec 24, 2017 at 14:03

If you only disable WiFi, mobile data, NFC and Bluetooth you still leave normal telephony and SMS/MMS.

MMS was for example the attack vector for exploiting the Stagefright bug which is still not fixed on all mobile phones. Even if mobile data are switched off you'll still receive a SMS notification about the pending MMS which is spooled at the provider and will usually be automatically downloaded as soon as mobile data are available again. This means that the Stagefright exploit will not be triggered when somebody sends the message to you but only once you feel safe again to turn mobile data on again.
In other words, it might still be possible to hack your phone this way, only that the exploit will not be active immediately.

Apart from this known bug there might be still unknown or unpublished bugs which use the ability of the attacker to send data to your phone even if most of the communication services are switched off like you do. For example there might be bugs in the handling of plain SMS messages or handling of GPS data or by processing normal calls which might be triggered for example with customized GSM stations or GPS spoofing equipment. The data processing stacks are often not developed with an attacker in mind which works at the lower protocol level, which can be seen for example by the far reaching recent exploit of Broadcom chips (which requires WiFi at least partly on).

  • 1
    And even then, one could have physical access to your phone and just use an USB-OTG cable and game over. Dec 23, 2017 at 15:12
  • 6
    AFAIK, Stagefright uses a crafted MMS and MMS are not delivered when both mobile data and WiFi are off. Dec 23, 2017 at 16:18
  • @SergeBallesta Actually, I believe you do. You can receive an MMS over GSM/GPRS, if I'm not mistaken. Dec 24, 2017 at 0:50
  • @SergeBallesta: you are right that MMS needs mobile data for delivery. This means that the exploit can still be sent but it will only be active later once the OP feels safe again and left the dangerous environment and turns mobile data on again. I've edited my answer accordingly. Dec 24, 2017 at 5:54
  • @SteffenUllrich A bug over MMS isn't going to be more or less likely to occur at a security con like DC unless you give out your number. This is more of an answer to whether or not remote exploitation is ever possible, not the security implications of this specific question.
    – forest
    Dec 24, 2017 at 5:58

When disabling all that, as the other answers mention, there are still various attack vectors such as SMS/MMS. If you do use any apps on your phone, those apps may re-enable wifi/mobile data. If I were you I would just take the battery out of my phone completely :).

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .