What is the strength of algorithms such as DES (Rijndael) and Blowfish used in password manager Safe password, with the current development (2018) of quantum computing, the former parallel processing, the mandating backdoor in the face of a brute-force attack.
DES, especially single DES, cannot be considered secure. A brute force attack in 1998 broke a DES key in 56 hours with a $250,000 specialized machine. More modern estimates are around $10,000 and 24-26 hours to break a DES key, using off-the-shelf tools and without quantum computing. That's not what anyone would consider secure.
Although Blowfish is not as insecure, some attacks can crack messages if few GBs of data have been encrypted using the same key.
"Mandatory backdoors" could break any algorithm.
Although some people suspect that one (or more) such backdoor was inserted into DES, there's no proof. In fact, there is some evidence to the contrary, as some modifications of DES imposed by the NSA actually hardened it against attacks that weren't publicly known.
As for Blowfish, I'm not aware of any claim, let alone evidence, about the existence of a backdoor.
With quantum computing one could brute-force a key with a time complexity that is the square root of the one required by a classical computer. An M-qubit quantum computer, where M is O(log2(2^56)), could break a DES key in 2^28 attempts rather than 2^56.
Currently, AES-256 is considered secure even with quantum computing, while AES-128 is not. DES is not, due to its very limited (56 bit) key size. As for Blowfish, the current default implementation uses 128 bits, which wouldn't be enough to withstand quantum attacks.
So Blowfish and Des are in current implementation are insecure (see a related article here). Without a doubt this would only get worse as quantum computing emerges. I would suggest going with AES and SHA-512, however even this may not be a challenge for quantum computers due to their insane increase of clock cycles.