In its recent policy, the US Department of Defense has prohibited the use of GPS-featured devices for its overseas personnel.

They explain it with a theory that commercial devices like smartphones or fitness trackers can store the geo-position (GPS) data along with the device owner's personal information on third-party servers, and this information can leak to the enemies, which, in turn, would “potentially create unintended security consequences and increased risk to the joint force and mission.”

Although it's a nice theory, I'd like to know whether this policy is just a theory or it has been based on some confirmed incidents of such use of cyber-warfare in an ongoing war.
Hence the question: Is there any confirmed evidence of actual use of cyber-warfare exploiting the vulnerable GPS data? If so, what are they?

I have initially asked this question on Politics.SE, but was suggested to ask it here instead.

  • 40
    I would be hesitant to call this "exploiting GPS vulnerabilities".
    – forest
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 0:56
  • 14
    Perhaps "leveraging vulnerable GPS data" would be better?
    – gowenfawr
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 1:39
  • 6
    The Netherlands have recently forbidden the usage of certain apps by military personel for exactly this reason. Too easy to figure out where the units were located. While I can't say it has been used to target anyone yet, it's definitely a major concern for multiple countries so far.
    – Mast
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 6:38
  • 21
    Have a read ;-) theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/28/… Shows the layout of some army bases (US in this article), as created by joggers.
    – rkeet
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 7:02
  • 28
    It's not even GPS data. It's location data. The fact that in some cases it was provided by a GPS receiver is not really relevant to anything! Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 10:53

5 Answers 5


Confirmed cases? Yes, at least two. One is Strava, and the other is Polar.

When Strava updated its global heat map, it showed some areas in supposed desert areas full of activity. Who would go jogging, at night, on the desert? What about US soldiers?

An interactive map posted on the Internet that shows the whereabouts of people who use fitness devices such as Fitbit also reveals highly sensitive information about the locations and activities of soldiers at U.S. military bases, in what appears to be a major security oversight.

In war zones and deserts in countries such as Iraq and Syria, the heat map becomes almost entirely dark — except for scattered pinpricks of activity. Zooming in on those areas brings into focus the locations and outlines of known U.S. military bases, as well as of other unknown and potentially sensitive sites — presumably because American soldiers and other personnel are using fitness trackers as they move around.

Using fitness trackers will allow the enemy to detect the place, extrapolate the number of soldiers, the patrol patterns and path, and even identify the soldiers. If you can identify someone that lives somewhere in Montana, and suddenly spent 4 months on Pakistan, you can bet he is a soldier. And using the pace and heart rate, you can even say how fit the person is.

The Polar leak was even worse:

With two pairs of coordinates dropped over any sensitive government location or facility, it was possible to find the names of personnel who track their fitness activities dating as far back as 2014.

The reporters identified more than 6,400 users believed to be exercising at sensitive locations, including the NSA, the White House, MI6 in London, and the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba, as well as personnel working on foreign military bases.

The Polar API allowed anyone to query any profile, public or private, without any rate limit. The user ID was pretty easy to predict, and 650k+ user profiles were downloaded, several GB of data. Just ask, and Polar would give all.

The post shows lots of sensitive places (nuclear facilities, military bases, NSA headquarters, Guantanamo Bay facilities, among others) and could identify the users on those places, and even their home addresses, Facebook pages and personal pictures.

You don't need to think too much to realize the damage that can be done with all that information.

  • 101
    I still consider these stories the absolute perfect example not only of how dangerous it is to share-by-default everything you do online and offline, but also how little thought people give to it in this increasingly connected age. It's really staggering. Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 10:54
  • 17
    I still remember how angry I was when Facebook started urging children to report their locations and to identify who was with them.
    – WGroleau
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 12:12
  • 22
    @MartinBonner you aren't expecting the Chinese military to post on their Twitter account something like "We used Polar Tracker data to discover home address from someone working at NSA, and hacked their home WiFi to infect their computers with exfiltrating malware". Right?
    – ThoriumBR
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 16:28
  • 11
    @MartinBonner Personally, I think the working assumption/hypothesis should be that it has been used, but that you simply don't know about it.
    – code_dredd
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 20:03
  • 4
    @ThoriumBR The API might be suspended, but that doesn't mean the data isn't available. If someone already downloaded it, they can make it available.
    – mbomb007
    Commented Aug 9, 2018 at 15:07

Yes, exploitation of location data in combat: FancyBear Tracking Ukrainian artillery units

In short, Ukrainian artillery units used malware-infused app to compute shooting solutions for their D-30 122mm towed howitzer. It has been found that these units suffered suspiciously high losses.

Quoting more from the Crowdstrike report (emphasis mine):

  • From late 2014 and through 2016, FANCY BEAR X-Agent implant was covertly distributed on Ukrainian military forums within a legitimate Android application developed by Ukrainian artillery officer Yaroslav Sherstuk.
  • The original application enabled artillery forces to more rapidly process targeting data for the Soviet-era D-30 Howitzer employed by Ukrainian artillery forces reducing targeting time from minutes to under 15 seconds. According to Sherstuk’s interviews with the press, over 9000 artillery personnel have been using the application in Ukrainian military.
  • Successful deployment of the FANCY BEAR malware within this application may have facilitated reconnaissance against Ukrainian troops. The ability of this malware to retrieve communications and gross locational data from an infected device makes it an attractive way to identify the general location of Ukrainian artillery forces and engage them.
  • Open source reporting indicates that Ukrainian artillery forces have lost over 50% of their weapons in the 2 years of conflict and over 80% of D-30 howitzers, the highest percentage of loss of any other artillery pieces in Ukraine’s arsenal.
  • 17
    Yaroslav Sherstuk must be horrified! I can only imagine how it would feel to have a nice little creation meant to help my countrymen get subverted to kill them like this. Commented Aug 9, 2018 at 14:36
  • 12
    @Ruadhan2300 Damn. Code signing really does save lives.
    – NReilingh
    Commented Aug 10, 2018 at 1:28
  • That's one horrifying example, thanks. I found an article showing a simpler tactic, see my answer Commented Aug 10, 2018 at 18:39
  • 6
    Except the entire premise is based on grossly incorrect data; it's basically fake news. Read the update at the very top of the post: "...excluding the Naval Infantry battalion in the Crimea which was effectively captured wholesale, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost between 15% and 20% of their pre-war D–30 inventory in combat operations.” Even then, that's a worthless number unless we are given comparison to other forces.
    – user71659
    Commented Aug 10, 2018 at 20:10

I've stumbled across this article. It assumes that the Russian army in Ukraine uses equipment capable of detecting the location of cellphones — not even necessarily GPS-enabled smartphones, just anything that uses standard cell operators (quite often compromised).

The Future Of Information Warfare Is Here — And The Russians Are Already Doing It

(highlight mine)

So reports Army Col. Liam Collins in the August issue of ARMY magazine. Here’s how it works:

“The Russians are adept at identifying Ukrainian positions by their electrometric signatures,” writes Collins. One would expect that, but the thing that impressed me what came next.

“In one tactic, [Ukrainian] soldiers receive texts telling them they are ‘surrounded and abandoned.’
Minutes later, their families receive a text stating, ‘Your son is killed in action,’ which often prompts a call or text to the soldiers.
Minutes later, soldiers receive another message telling them to ‘retreat and live,’
followed by an artillery strike to the location where a large group of cellphones was detected.”

  • 2
    Short Message Type 0 has been used to that effect by police forces, so I am not surprised that it would be used in war. Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 20:19

A Russian soldier on duty posted pictures automatically tagged with GPS data that showed he was in Ukraine, back when Russia was denying having troops there.


Not directly involving combat, but definitely something his country would prefer to avoid.


In the early 2000's Hezbollah used several dark web sites in order to distribute media and propaganda. Intelligence agents discovered that most of the uploaded images/video still had embedded GPS meta-data, and used that to map out suspected terrorist hot spots.

The United States government declined to take action, citing the intel as "of questionable credibility". The Kremlin, however...

  • 6
    ... did what, exactly? Commented Aug 13, 2018 at 15:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .