2

Imagine I have the research papers on designing COVID-19, the cure and some nuke launch codes on my laptop and want to often communicate those to another computer at my home. I already installed a physically separate STP cable network. Now what? My previous experiment in the field resulted in the conclusion that un-updated OSs are worse than being online all the time. Because 2 years later you plug in an empty USB thumbdrive and things break.

4
  • 6
    The point of an airgap is that no communication is physically possible at all. That contradicts your requirement to exchange information. If it is about allowing communication between your laptop and the other computer in the physically separate network than you need also make sure that none of the systems involved has other means of communication, i.e. that WiFi is not only switched off but better non-existent, similar for bluetooth etc. If none of the systems can exchange data with the outside world then OS patches are less relevant since nobody can access the OS with some new attacks. – Steffen Ullrich Jun 13 '20 at 19:53
  • @SteffenUllrich thank you a LOT for spending the time to comment! I have a physically-separate LAN! Not logically! The attack vector I am worried about is: 'I never connect my two computers to the internet. Two years later I need a small python(e.g.) library.' This has happened. – Vorac Jun 17 '20 at 17:41
  • "Now what?" is not a clear question. What do you want to do? What's your goal? I could answer "now turn it all off" and that could be a valid answer. – schroeder Jun 17 '20 at 18:14
  • @SteffenUllrich the whole question is how to airgap in personal/micro environments? expressed in a needlessly elaborate way. A good answer would point to papers, tutorials or technologies. – Vorac Jun 18 '20 at 17:25
4

The point at which you can exchange the data makes it a "non-air-gapped interface".

The definition of an air-gap as per RFC 4049 is:

An interface between two systems at which [..] they are not connected physically [..]

Normally, when dealing with highly sensitive data, you don't save it on an end-device. There are Product Data Management solutions with comprehensive permission management that will run on a seperate server and store your files encrypted.

Any given user will never get access to the actual files but only to specific functions that can be applied to that file. In this way, you can ensure that some users can only view partial data whereas other users, if necessary, can commit write changes to the PDM solution that will then be applied to the actual file if found legitimate.

That said, data confidentiality is a very complex topic that does not have a perfect solution. If you cannot guarantee the legitimacy of an access, there is no way.

If a user cannot copy the data, he/she will pull out his/her smartphone and make a photo. Once you hand the data to anyone who is not 100% trustworthy, mark it as "considered to be gone".

1
  • Thank you for the answer! My use case is different. I have not users. I have no database. I want to design a theoretically secure home surveillance. And the logging server needs to be updated sometimes(not for security reasons but due to 'I need ...'). Recorded video files are a completely different issue. – Vorac Jun 17 '20 at 17:55

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.