I'm trying to find difference between Zeek and Snort 3. Сan anybody tell me what are the advantages of Zeek against Snort 3?

2 Answers 2


Snort is more a traditional IDS/IPS which does some deep packet inspection and then applies signatures on the traffic in order to detect (and maybe block) attacks.

Zeek does not claim to be an IDS: instead it claims to be a network monitor and traffic analyzer. From their own description:

Zeek is a passive, open-source network traffic analyzer. It is primarily a security monitor that inspects all traffic on a link in depth for signs of suspicious activity. More generally, however, Zeek supports a wide range of traffic analysis tasks even outside of the security domain, including performance measurements and helping with trouble-shooting.

As far as I know (i.e. what I got from discussions with others) Zeek is therefore more used to capture the details of the traffic and forward these to some analysis system. The analysis regarding attacks is primarily done outside of Zeek and the focus for Zeek is on collecting detailed information about the traffic. Sometimes custom protocol dissectors are added which are specific for the protocols used in the environment. I think Bro/Zeek is for example used in Darktrace to get the traffic details.

Classical signature based IDS like Snort or Suricata are instead more used as actual IDS, i.e the focus is on matching specific attack signatures. For example Cisco provides its subscribers new signatures when new attacks emerge. But I also know several cases where Snort or Suricata are used to only collect information about the traffic and feed these traffic details into a larger system, similar to how Zeek is typically used.

In other words: there is overlapping functionality. But the primary goals of these tools are different and thus are also the use cases.


Both of them are NIDS(Network intrusion detection systems). The main difference is the way they make the detection, for example in snort the detection is made inside the software by using rules. On the other hand, Bro/Zeek works by dumping the information on files and you need to do the detection with other tools, however I think in bro you can create plugins in Lua that can label the network conversations as you want. Probably there are more differences (License, format files, and so on) but right now that are the ones that came to my mind.

  • thanks for your answer. But I'm interested in more specific things. Maybe zeek can detect the types of attacks that snort cannot? Or maybe it requires less resources?
    – ustavsaat
    Jun 20, 2020 at 18:00
  • @ustavsaat, what attacks are you interested in detecting? That may help you find "the right tool for the job" or get someone to suggest something you haven't considered such as RITA.
    – phbits
    Jun 21, 2020 at 2:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.