2

Possible Duplicate:
Are SSL encrypted requests vulnerable to Replay Attacks?

I have an SSL connection with my bank open from A to B

A -> B

Through that connection I transfer $100 to my friend. However, it just so happens that my friend controls a proxy somewhere between A and B (at say M) and is watching the encrypted packets go by (he can't see them unencrypted, but he is capturing the encrypted contents).

A -> M -> B

Scenario A) The ssl connection is still active, and my friend replays the packet that gave him $100.

Scenario B) I send another request to the bank for something unrelated. But this time my friend, at M, modifies my packet in transit to be the same packet that gave him $100 earlier.

Not sure if these scenarios would be handled differently, so I considered them separately.

What does SSL/TLS do to prevent these type of live replay attacks? I get that SSL generates a nonce during the initial handshake, but that would only prevent replay attacks for another ssl session down the road once new nonces are generated.

marked as duplicate by Jeff Ferland Nov 5 '12 at 4:19

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

0

SSL connections use a stream cipher (RC4) or a block cipher in CBC mode (AES, DES), i.e. (very roughly speaking) ciphers where the next encrypted block is a function of all previously encrypted blocks.

Therefore an attack like the one you propose is not effective.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_modes_of_operation http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_intro.html

  • 1
    While SSL is immune to replay-attacks, your reasons are invalid. In particular if it used just AES-CBC it'd be vulnerable in Scenario A. What prevents replays within the connection is that each fragment is protected by a MAC that includes a sequence number. – CodesInChaos Nov 5 '12 at 11:49
  • Well, I am not an expert in this field, but from what I understand of how CBC works, the previous encrypted block is used as the initialization vector when encrypting the next one, so that the two packets giving your friend $100 will actually differ, rendering a replay attack impossible (see for instance: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cbc_encryption.png). Maybe you are mistaking CBC for ECB? – zakk Nov 5 '12 at 17:37

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.