Purpose: test if PtH (Pass the hash) is feasible against Unix box
Scenario:
Windows host (Windows Server 2008) vulnerable to eternalblue
got Administration hash as part of the post-exploitation process (meterpreter hashdump command)
Administrator:500:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:3ab8988c5403e0a939927a7c70ee4360:::
through metasploit module scanner/smb/smb_login I checked if the same password (in this case hash) it had been used more than once within the entire subnet Interesting output:
+] 192.168.92.80:445 - 192.168.92.80:445 - Success: '.\Administrator:aad3b435b51404eeaad3b435b51404ee:3ab8988c5403e0a939927a7c70ee4360'
192.168.92.80: NAS (Unix O.S)
My questions:
- With regard to Metasploit how can it tell if the hash grabbed during the post-exploitation phase is actually correct and eventually might grant access to the host
- I tried PSExec (Metasploit) and also pth-winexe with the same hash above, but to no avail (all attempts failed)
Is PtH possible, if the target is a Unix host? If my reasoning is wrong, what should I do in order to accomplish my objective
any help will be highly appreciated