With non-passwored mechanism like biometrics, behavioural biometrics or context, it depends on the failure mode of the mechanism.
With pure biometric authentication, like voice recognition, the mechanism fails when the person's voice changes due to natural causes, such as a head-cold. A sequence of failures should take them to a human with a different way of verifying the person, such as a zoom call. The mechanism should also "learn" each of the expected changes, so that when the person recovers, they don't get locked out again.
That's wildly different from passwords, where you are trying to deal with password-guessing as a failure mode!
Behavioral biometrics, such as typing cadence, need to be proven to have a success mode. In other words, they sound more that a little bit like snake oil.
Context fails when your context changes, such as when I move from my mail work machine to my laptop. I wouldn't consider it as an authentication mechanism at all: anyone could steal my laptop and pretend to be me.
Finally, these three might make useful reauthentication checks, applied after the person has authenticated to ensure the same person is using the login, and someone else has not taken it over. All would need to fail immediately to a human verifier, or they would constitute a self-inflicted a denial-of-service attack.