We've received several rua
reports indicating that one of our direct competitors is sending emails with our domain in the mail from headers.
I do not have access to the actual emails sources, and I have no idea what would cause this. The one cause I can think of is that somebody at the competitors company is sending out emails on our behalf (a conclusion I hope we can discredit).
Relevant rua
report section:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feedback>
(...)
<record>
<row>
<source_ip>209.85.220.69</source_ip><!-- mail-sor-f69.google.com -->
<count>2</count>
<policy_evaluated>
<disposition>none</disposition>
<dkim>fail</dkim>
<spf>fail</spf>
<reason>
<type>local_policy</type>
<comment>arc=pass</comment>
</reason>
</policy_evaluated>
</row>
<identifiers>
<header_from>[our domain].com</header_from>
</identifiers>
<auth_results>
<dkim>
<domain>[competitor domain]-com.20150923.gappssmtp.com</domain>
<result>pass</result>
<selector>20150923</selector>
</dkim>
<spf>
<domain>[competitor domain].com</domain>
<result>pass</result>
</spf>
</auth_results>
</record>
</feedback>
So, my question is:
What can cause this to happen? Is there normal behaviour that could cause these reports? Is this the result of legitimate email traffic? or is this an indication of malicious behaviour somewhere?
Side note
I'm unsure what the section means.
(...)
<reason>
<type>local_policy</type>
<comment>arc=pass</comment>
</reason>
(...)
Reading up on DMARC `arc` leads me to suspect it may be caused by email forwarding but `arc` should make sure the DKIM headers would still be available for authentication? In which case the forwarded email should not `fail` the DMARC policy?
<disposition>none</disposition>
; with ap=none
policy every message will be delivered regardless.From
.