I have a postfix mail server that accepts these cipher suites:


I noticed that when accessing this from macOS 12.3 with an Apple Silicon CPU over TLSv1.3 (i.e. client can choose suite), it selects the ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 suite, even though it's listed after the AES suites. I'm just (idly) wondering why – does Apple Silicon not have AES hardware acceleration?


Further to @foreverska's comment, I had thought that TLSv1.3 had reversed the older policy of only allowing the server to choose a cipher suite, however, it's apparently not quite like that. I found a discussion which clarified things. It's not so much that TLSv1.3 allows for client choice, but that TLSv1.3 suites are considered equal weight, effectively letting the client choose from a shortlist. A TLSv1.3 client connecting to a 1.3 server should only select from 1.3 suites, even if they are listed after 1.2 suites. This is borne out by the Qualys SSL labs results on one of my own sites, which is served from nginx with server-side suite ordering enabled:

Qualys cipher ordering results

However, while that's good to know, why macOS would select ChaCha20 over AES if it has acceleration remains a mystery...

Further confirmation of client ordering of cipher suites in TLSv1.3 from RFC8446's definition of ClientHello:

cipher_suites: A list of the symmetric cipher options supported by the client, specifically the record protection algorithm (including secret key length) and a hash to be used with HKDF, in descending order of client preference.

and in ServerHello:

cipher_suite: The single cipher suite selected by the server from the list in ClientHello.cipher_suites.

So it appears that the concept of server-side cipher suite ordering doesn't exist at all within TLSv1.3.


2 Answers 2


Apple has an AES engine as part of the Secure Enclave subsystem. It provides:

a boot ROM to establish a hardware root of trust, an AES engine for efficient and secure cryptographic operations, and protected memory

The AES Engine is a separate component from both the Secure Enclave and the Secure Enclave AES Engine, but its operation is closely tied to the Secure Enclave

The Secure Enclave hardware feature is listed in the reference to be on Mac computers with Apple silicon (and a several other Apple devices).

I couldn't find any definitive reason why an Apple silicon device would choose Chacha20 over AES. The link below provides speculation but nothing definitive.

Apple Secure Enclave
What's the appeal of using Chacha20 instead of AES


Which cipher suite is chosen by the server, irrespective of what accelerators a client has. The client can submit a preference list, but the server is free to ignore it.

The key would be to check the postfix server's preference list. If Chacha happens to be high on it's list (maybe it's in a VM without accelerator support), that may just be what it chooses.

  • I included the server's suite list in my question, but the server doesn't necessarily get to choose the suite because with TLSv1.3 (unlike 1.2 and below), all choices are good, and it's preferable to have the client choose in those circumstances.
    – Synchro
    Apr 4, 2022 at 18:09
  • I can't find reference to the idea that the client chooses which suite from the list to use. Do you have a reference for this? The client of course could submit a preference list which doesn't include cipher suites which would be too slow for them but the server ultimately selects from that list (to my current knowledge).
    – foreverska
    Apr 4, 2022 at 18:14
  • See update to my Q about that
    – Synchro
    Apr 4, 2022 at 19:58
  • Can you explain this "why macOS would select" line? We now know the final ciphersuite is chosen by the server. So I'm a bit confused why this line persists. Did your macbook send a preferred ciphersuite list which only contains chacha or something?
    – foreverska
    Apr 4, 2022 at 20:32
  • No we don't know that. The upshot of that update is that there is no server order for TLSv1.3 suites, and it is up to the client after all. The server order policy appears to simply not apply to 1.3 suites. I tested it by removing ChaCha20 from the server's list, and the client was then happy to pick an AES suite, so it's not that the client lacks support but that it appears to actively prefer ChaCha20, hence my question - why?
    – Synchro
    Apr 4, 2022 at 20:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .