Background: I've always reused same username/password on all websites and got hacked regularly. I am considering using a password manager, but I don't like the need of storing a database. So I came up with my own idea.

Assume there are multiple services for which one needs to be able to recover a password, each having a unique name name_i - a short string. You pick a master_password. Let h(x) be the output of a cryptographic hash function for string x and + denote concatenation. Then one can choose their password for service name_i to be h(master_password+name_i).

Knowing the name and master_password it is trivial to recover password for any given service. By cryptographic hash function definition, even when a subset of passwords gets leaked, the master password an the rest of the passwords should be safe.

Is the above reasoning correct and could this be a viable way of managing my own passwords?

  • 1
    See security.stackexchange.com/questions/55592/… for a similar question.
    – mti2935
    Jul 16, 2022 at 19:26
  • 2
    "I don't like the need of storing a database" so use a cloud-based password manager that provides zero-trust end-to-end encryption (e.g. BitWarden, 1Password, LastPass, etc.). I guarantee you this will be safer and more convenient than your proposed system.
    – CBHacking
    Jul 16, 2022 at 21:31

1 Answer 1


I've actually built a cryptographically secure password manager which generated passwords from a main password, a string, and a set of parameter values. This is not as trivial as it seems, and I'd recommend using a regular password manager (I like 1Password) instead. Here's why:

  • Your proposed solution is not secure. When using a password as the source of entropy, it's recommended to use salt, which you have no way of storing, and you need to use a suitable password hashing function, not just concatenation with a cryptographic hash. You'd need to at least switch to Argon2id or scrypt or some other suitable function.
  • Simply using the hash output will not work for many websites. If the output is hex, it won't contain both upper- and lowercase letters or special characters, which many sites require, and some sites limit strings to a certain number of characters, and a 64-character hex output will be too long. Some sites require a special character, but it has to be from a limited set. You need a way to take your hash and generate a string of a specified length and composition.
  • You also need a way to encode arbitrary existing passwords. While sharing accounts is not a good security practice, in some cases it will be required. Perhaps you and your partner share a credit card, but the company allows only one account to manage it. Thus, you need to be able to take an existing password and store it using your password manager.
  • You need a way to change passwords for a site. If a site is compromised, they may force you to reset your password, and you'd need to pick a new one. Using just the site name won't work here, and you'd need to include some sort of version number for the password, which requires that you store that somewhere.
  • Most cell phones don't offer general purpose terminal commands or hash programs, so you won't be able to perform this functionality on your phone. If you're using secure passwords, typing a long password in from your computer can be very difficult.

In the ideal world, where any cryptographically secure string were allowed as a password and sites could never be compromised, this might be a viable approach with a change to the structure of the algorithm. However, your design has serious practical problems due to real world constraints. I even found my design, which addressed all of these issues by storing a set of site names and parameters, to be functionally difficult to use, which is why I switched to 1Password. I would strongly encourage you to use a standard, secure, reputable tool for this, whether it stores data in the cloud or on your local machine, to ensure that it's secure and flexible enough to meet your needs.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .