I was reading this security advise, which says:

The neovim process binds itself to, so malicious actors on your LAN should be unable to interact with either your webextension or your neovim process.

There is a typo there, as "unable" should be "able", right?

  • This is a networking question, not a security question: "why can't a node on the LAN access another node's loopback address?"
    – schroeder
    Commented Feb 2 at 8:52

1 Answer 1

2 is the IP address for the loopback interface on a system. It is only reachable from the system itself and not from outside the system, including not reachable from the LAN. So there is no typo here.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .