I was reading about return-to-libc attacks at Wikipedia.
According to what I read and understood from the article, ASCII armoring means that binary data is converted into ASCII values by grouping them into 8-bit chunks.
The article quotes:
Indeed, with ASCII-Armoring, all the system libraries (e.g. libc) addresses contain a NULL byte. Nevertheless, this same concept can be used in a similar and more advanced attack known as return-to-plt, where instead of returning to libc, the attacker uses the PLT functions loaded in the binary (e.g. system@plt, execve@plt, sprintf@plt, strcpy@plt, etc...).
Can someone please explain, how exactly does ASCII armoring prevent buffer overflow? I didn't get the part where it says, that system library addresses contain a NULL byte. And how does return-to-plt
prevent buffer overflow? I searched, but didn't find much explanation regarding return-to-plt
attacks.