2

OFF Pocket:

OFF Pocket is a "privacy accessory for mobile phones to block all signals".

To use the OFF Pocket simply place your phone inside the case and close it. Your phone is now OFF. Untrackable. Unhackable. Undistractable.

link: OFF Pocket on kickstarter

Why better to use this accessory than switch off my mobile phone? Is there any communication while my mobile phone not working (batteries out)?

1
  • The last question maybe looks dumb but maybe not... :)
    – Raymond
    Commented Aug 26, 2013 at 12:37

2 Answers 2

5

When the iPhone was first released, it was rumoured that it could not be switched off; that when "off" it was still somewhat active and could be awakened remotely. This was just a rumour, never confirmed (to my knowledge) but not proven false either.

It is true that the "on/off" button is software: even when the phone is off, it still draws a tiny bit of current to detect when the button is pressed again. However, the CPU is powered down at that time (as can be shown by the fact that the phone can retain its battery life for weeks when "off", and it could not be that if its CPU was powered continuously). A dedicated circuit is used for that.

It can be said that a phone COULD be maliciously altered to be "somewhat on" when visibly "off", and could be activated remotely and/or briefly awaken once per hour to transmit some data. I am not aware of actual sightings of such modified phones, but in some circles (governments, big corporations) they require participants to strategic meetings to power down their phone and remove the battery; since iPhones don't support easy battery removal, there are "off boxes", electromagnetically shielded, to store the phones during the meeting. The "OFF Pocket" device that you link to is a one-phone version of such an "off box".

So such a device can be useful to counteract a potential threat which "makes sense" in some contexts (big businesses really spy on each other when they can pull it off), although there is no definite reported case of a modified smartphone turned into a spying device. Note that preventing communications is only half the job; the phone could still record voices and transmit the data when next linked to a network. In that sense, the really complete protection measure is not an "OFF Pocket" or an "off box", but really to store the phones in a separate room. The "OFF Pocket" device is an incomplete solution to a feared but unproven issue and, as such, falls into the same category as engraving a pentacle on the case to ward off evil spirits: it does more good to the user's mind than to the user's security.

(I suspect that the unofficial point of the "no battery / off box" system is to make people pay attention to the meeting, instead of looking at their emails.)

2
  • Electromagnetic shielding is notoriously difficult to do right. One would need to measure electric field to be sure that the emissions are below a fixed threshold. Commented Aug 26, 2013 at 13:35
  • 1
    Thank you! I forgot about the iPhones don't support the battery removal! :)
    – Raymond
    Commented Aug 26, 2013 at 13:38
5

I'd say that the off pocket isn't any better than powering down your phone and in terms of usability it's possibly worse, as some phones will run their batteries down quicker when out of coverage.

Oddly given their target marketing the best use I can think of for this is for law enforcement to use it when acquiring mobile phones for forensic review as it stops remote wipe while not powering them down which could lose valuable information.

1
  • 1
    +1 for noting excessive battery usage. An unconnected phone is frequently broadcasting at high power looking to connect to a cell tower. (A connected phone transmits only with the minimum power needed to reach the cell tower, and less frequently.) If you're going to use the "off pocket", do your battery a favor and switch it to airplane mode first. Commented Aug 28, 2013 at 4:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .