I want to trial a HSTS policy on my blog without enabling it site wide initially. As a HSTS policy is just a HTTP response header would there be any problem with sending the header in PHP like so:

header("strict-transport-security: max-age=600");

The site will redirect any http:// request to https:// and I realise that this will likely result in the HSTS header being sent over http:// which it shouldn't. However, to be HSTS compliant a user agent should disregard HSTS policy delivered via http:// as it could have been maliciously injected. As this is only for testing purposes I'm not overly concerned anyway.

This will allow me to issue the header on a specific page only and expose it only to myself without affecting any other users. I could also have another page to disable the HSTS policy like so:

header("strict-transport-security: max-age=0");

Should this prove to be successful are there any issues that can be seen with issuing HSTS policy in such a way? Perhaps users on shared hosting or without access/knowledge to configure a response header could still implement HSTS in this way.


HSTS is enabled by returning the strict-transport-security header from a HTTPS response - the browser does not care whether this is set in PHP, by the server, or by a load balancer - as long as it receives a valid header over HTTPS then HSTS will be enabled.

You should be OK only returning this header from a single page for testing too. RFC 6797 states

If a UA receives HTTP responses from a Known HSTS Host over a secure channel but the responses are missing the STS header field, the UA MUST continue to treat the host as a Known HSTS Host until the max-age value for the knowledge of that Known HSTS Host is reached.

so your other responses without the header will not cancel HSTS for your site.

Setting max-age=0 is also the correct way to cancel HSTS for your site (per receiving user agent). The only thing I've spotted which is non-standard the way you are doing is that you are sending the header over HTTP also - although this would be ignored by a compliant user agent it is invalid so I would make sure to only transmit this when the connection is secure (best to stick to standards as close as possible I find).

You can check whether to emit the header with the following code that will check that the page has been accessed via HTTPS:

function isSSL(){

    if($_SERVER['https'] == 1) /* Apache */ {
        return TRUE;
    } elseif ($_SERVER['https'] == 'on') /* IIS */ {
        return TRUE;
    } elseif ($_SERVER['SERVER_PORT'] == 443) /* others */ {
        return TRUE;
    } else {
        return FALSE; /* just using http */


The HSTS header is for a domain (or subdomains, if supplied with the includeSubDomain directive). However, a value of 0 in max-age will cause the user agent to cease using HSTS. (Refer to section 6.1.1 of the draft spec.)

  • 1
    Yes I know :-) That's why I said "I could also have another page to disable the HSTS policy like so" The UA would stop treating the domain as a HSTS host once it received that header, effectively disabling HSTS for the domain. – Scott Helme Oct 1 '13 at 7:19
  • 1
    I don't see a reason why that setup won't work. – Novice User Oct 1 '13 at 9:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.