My Girlfriend has a years-old laptop from lenovo. I checked it over and wasn't surprised that the Superfish / Komodia Root CA certificate was not present. However I found some others that appear to be similar in function if not purpose.

There's keys which appear to have been installed by Avast anti-virus and Skype, both of which are expected to be on the machine. However, the puprose of these keys is presumably quite similar to superfish - interception of secure web content by dynamically creating signed SSL certificates for remote sites.

This potentially opens up similar security issues to what was found with the Superfish software. i.e. if an attacker has these keys they can issue certificates that will be trusted by the local computer.

1). If I understand correctly, in order for these programs to play MITM, they need to have access to the private key associated with the installed cert authority. So it can be obtained by reverse engineering the sotware. Correct?

2) Can anyone confirm whether or not these keys are individually generated for each installation?

  • @AndréDaniel that seems like a good way for the extension to operate, but then what is the certificate installed for?
    – mc0e
    Commented Mar 3, 2015 at 12:25
  • I said that based on the fact that their extension is only compatible with certain browsers (a certificate-based approach would work for any browser), but turns out I was wrong (Google for "skype click to call certificate). Sorry about that. :c
    – user42178
    Commented Mar 3, 2015 at 13:43

2 Answers 2


My understanding is that Superfish installs the exact same certificate and private key into every computer, so once you obtain the hard-coded private key you can use it to man-in-the-middle anyone who has superfish installed. Avast does not do this; it dynamically generates a unique certificate and private key for every install.

This is what the Avast certificate on my desktop looks like: enter image description here

And here is the Avast certificate on my laptop: enter image description here

So clearly, they are different certificates. This means I cannot just grab the Avast private key from my own computer and use it to attack someone else who has Avast installed. The same cannot be said for superfish.

Another difference is that Avast does not just blindly man-in-the-middle everything. Instead, it first verifies the validity of the original certificate. If the original certificate is valid, it will proceed to man-in-the-middle the traffic so it can scan for malware. But if there is a problem with the original certificate, it will intentionally man-in-the-middle with a certificate NOT installed in the trusted certificate list, generating a browser warning. You can see this working in the screenshots below:

When visiting a website with a valid certificate, Avast MITMs the traffic to scan for malware...

enter image description here

But if I visit a site with a self-signed certificate, Avast will intentionally MITM with an untrusted certificate to generate a browser warning - notice the name "Avast Web/Mail Shield UNTRUSTED root"

enter image description here

This way, Avast avoids accidentally causing a user to visit a website with a bad certificate. It's not perfect, but it's still a lot safer than blindly man-in-the-middling everything, with a root certificate that is identical and trusted on every computer like Superfish does.

  • 5
    Actually, Superfish also tries to verify the original certificate, but it fails majorly: blog.filippo.io/komodia-superfish-ssl-validation-is-broken
    – huyz
    Commented Feb 23, 2015 at 7:05
  • What happens if, for example, you visit Google but its certificate is issued by GoDaddy?
    – Iszi
    Commented Feb 24, 2015 at 13:26
  • @iszi I don't think that would be possible unless GoDaddy gets compromised or Google decides to switch to GoDaddy.
    – tlng05
    Commented Feb 24, 2015 at 17:03
  • 1
    @Iszi If an attacker manages to obtain a valid, non-revoked certificate issued by GoDaddy for google.com, all browsers would automatically trust it and it wouldn't matter if Avast is installed. If it's later revoked, Avast will realize that and block access to the page. Then it displays a popup "Avast web shield has blocked access to this page because the certificate has been revoked."
    – tlng05
    Commented Feb 24, 2015 at 20:56
  • 1
    @Iszi You can turn off Avast's HTTPS scanning to see the real certificate with literally three clicks, so I think anyone knowledgeable or concerned enough to want to check the certificate manually can still easily do so. People who want to use browser plugins to check certificates can disable it permanently in settings. For the majority of end users, getting infected with malware is probably a bigger security threat than the off chance of encountering a compromised certificate, so I think the default of enabling HTTPS scanning is sensible.
    – tlng05
    Commented Feb 25, 2015 at 2:04

IF you are unsure about Avast's behaviour, check the Avast Certificate validity date.

Avast reports, as for now, the Certificate to be valid between 2013- 10- 22 and 2016- 07- 06 as expiry date for this page in HTTPS://, Issued to *.stackexchange.com, and issued by

"avast! Web/Mail Shield Root".

Disabling Avast protection for 10 minutes, and checking again, the only change is that the issuer has exactly the same info, but the certificate issuer changes to

"DigiCert SHA2 High Assurance Server CA"

The expiry date from the original certificate isn't changed, neither what it's issued to.

  • 1
    Wasn't Superfish a valid cert?
    – schroeder
    Commented Feb 26, 2015 at 20:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .