Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with apparmor
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 17035
A filesystem-independent Linux kernel security module enabling Mandatory Access Control (MAC).
10
votes
Accepted
Restrict access to a specific directory on Linux
The upside -- yes, you can do this with SELinux. The downside -- you have to know SELinux. :)
You can execute these processes in different SELinux domains. E.g. let's call two processes "privapp" and …
- 6,578
1
vote
Network policies under AppArmor/SELinux
To add a personal experience note to the above -- using selinux in conjunction with iptables makes both the policy and your iptables look extremely complicated and convoluted. It's one of those cases …
- 6,578