Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with tls
Search options not deleted
user 272346
SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and/or TLS (Transport Layer Security)
1
vote
1
answer
2k
views
Any risks associated with having multiple TLS versions enabled at once?
On our server, we have TLS 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2 enabled. It hosts numerous client websites.
We were recently contacted by one such client flagging a concern that TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 is "still enabled". … I may be mistaken, but my understanding was that using TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 alone is the vulnerability. …
- 13