Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with pbkdf2
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 328553
PBKDF2 is a key derivation and strengthening function, commonly used for password storage.
2
votes
1
answer
159
views
Using PBKDF2 in combination with AES-KW defeats usage of BCrypt password hashes?
Our current idea:
PBKDF2 with HMAC-SHA512 @ 100.000 iterations
BCrypt (lets assume an average run time of 0.1s per hash)
Thus, to brute- force PBKDF2, it would require ~9.16e13 SHA512 hash evaluations. … Would it maybe be better to derive a key with sha256(bcrypt(password, salt)) instead of pbkdf2(password, salt)? Or maybe even pbkdf2(bcrypt(password, salt), salt)? …
- 327