Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with key
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 41742
Physical or digital keys. Digital keys are used for encryption or signing, or for authentication (e.g. API key). For product keys, use the tag product-key.
8
votes
1
answer
5k
views
Is `gpg --refresh-keys` secure and where is this documented?
My current fallback to --refresh-keys:
Download the new key
Compare the cryptographic hash of both, the old and the new key (output of gpg key.pgp)
Only update the old key if both hashes are the same … And it is not the question if I can trust the old key. The question is, can I trust the new key after --refresh-keys at the same level as after the update example above. …
- 231