Search Results

For the files, calling icacls or - since you're using Powershell - implementing the change yourself using [System.Security.AccessControl.*] classes are both valid options. You could also use Windows E …

Mike's answer says basically everything I have to offer about why this is a bad idea from a development perspective (and, as Ghedipunk's comment says, an unusable security feature provides no security …

In general, no; it's a bad design but not in a directly insecure way. However, it is going to generate a LOT of headaches down the road for you, if you (or any future customers/partners) use automated …

Lots of good answers here, but one that seems to be missing is to embrace the Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP). If there's no legitimate use case for erasing the router config files, don't give any …

Since you're using Linux, you can do this using iptables. It's possible to block specific UIDs from making specific requests. See https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/104830/block-specific-applica …

A "padding oracle" is an entity (usually some sort of server) that will decrypt an arbitrary message, verify whether the padding is correct, and return this information to the (arbitrary) submitter of …

Without going into the details, I want to say: do not underestimate the ongoing risk from unpatched (and sometimes unknown, that is, true 0-days) vulnerabilities in browsers. Browsers are exceptionall …

In a word, no. The best option is to move all the actual game logic to the server, and have the client be a thin client that just displays state and sends input. That wouldn't prevent various types of …

Only the size of the key/passphrase, really. Given long enough, it's always possible. An access point could theoretically have some rate limiting built into it, which would help against authentication …