Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with smb
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 72031
5
votes
Accepted
What to do if you still have SMBv1 running on your network?
You probably need some kind of advanced firewall since I think SMB is using the same network ports for v1, v2 and v3. So basic firewall ruling is probably not gonna get you anywhere. … Lastly, if the server was only used as a fileserver, you could maybe look into SMB alternatives like NFS. But that's not ideal for Windows servers (and clients). …
- 7,055