Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Favorites |
infavorites:mine infavorites:1234 |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
a cryptographic hash function with a 128-bit (16-byte) output, now deprecated
15
votes
For MD5, no one who is both reputable and competent is using it in a context where collision-resistance is important. For SHA-1, it's being phased out; the SHA-1 break was not practical when it was … decade's time. Compatibility matters.
Also, for many uses, MD5 and SHA-1 aren't cracked at all. They both have weaknesses against collision-resistance, meaning an attacker can create two messages that …
answered May 3 '15 by cpast
