Timeline for What are the best reasons you've heard for not implementing security?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2012 at 21:04 | comment | added | schroeder♦ | This and variants of this are common for me, too. Helping them with risk calculations is important, but rarely fruitful in my experience. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 19:37 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | Aye - see my answer for an example. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 19:32 | comment | added | user4516 | Still it comes down to money. The cost of additional security must be weighed against the cost and probability of a successful attack. Like the other answer says, the data may not be all that valuable, therefore the probability of an attack may be slim. | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 19:11 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | Challenge to go back with: that's what Sony, RSA, etc said, and look how much it cost them! | |
| Jan 26, 2012 at 17:35 | history | answered | user4516 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |