Skip to main content
30 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:29 comment added SomeoneSomewhereSupportsMonica DDoS is generally considered one specific attack - point lots of traffic, from lots of sources, at one server. DoS is a big class of attacks that stop things working - it's asking "Is there anything I can do that both takes down a service and tells me stuff". That's a massive amount of info.
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:26 comment added paparazzo @SomeoneSomewhere Really Distributed would be the difference in getting closed? Ironic this is about denial of service.
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:21 comment added SomeoneSomewhereSupportsMonica @Paparazzi Because if you include all attacks that deny service, then the post would probably be (rightfully) closed for being 'too broad'.
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:16 comment added paparazzo @SomeoneSomewhere OK. If the question is about gaining information what is the purpose of limiting to DDoS?
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:13 comment added SomeoneSomewhereSupportsMonica @Paparazzi DoS includes other, more sophiscated attacks than 'hammer the server until it fails' - ping of death, for an old example. While it's certainly possible to send enough traffic from one location to crash it, saying 'DDoS' makes it clear that you're talking about brute force traffic.
Aug 15, 2016 at 9:04 history protected Rory Alsop
Aug 15, 2016 at 7:25 answer added NoBugs timeline score: 0
Aug 15, 2016 at 6:52 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed Yes, it reveals the amount of resources the server has (approximately).
Aug 14, 2016 at 7:29 answer added Alex Bodnya timeline score: 0
Aug 13, 2016 at 18:25 answer added Aurand timeline score: 1
Aug 12, 2016 at 19:47 answer added coteyr timeline score: 3
Aug 12, 2016 at 17:32 comment added paparazzo Why do you limit this to DDoS? The question seems to apply to DoS in general.
Aug 11, 2016 at 18:27 answer added paparazzo timeline score: 0
Aug 11, 2016 at 16:58 comment added Dubu Since your question seems not limited to remote attacks: Does MAC flooding count?
Aug 11, 2016 at 13:43 comment added Matt Lyons-Wood You're not worried about the 2016 Australian Census are you? :P
Aug 11, 2016 at 13:27 answer added Dennis Jaheruddin timeline score: 2
Aug 11, 2016 at 13:03 vote accept KosugiNinja
Aug 11, 2016 at 6:36 comment added Pierre.Sassoulas Yes, theoretical ...but it could happen :)
Aug 11, 2016 at 3:56 answer added pipe timeline score: 10
Aug 10, 2016 at 20:39 comment added Thomas @Pierre.Sassoulas Hopefully the server uses constant-time comparisons to avoid leaking information... wait, who am I kidding?
Aug 10, 2016 at 20:16 answer added user6698139 timeline score: -3
Aug 10, 2016 at 16:29 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSecurity/status/763412055705673728
Aug 10, 2016 at 15:57 comment added Pierre.Sassoulas This is theoretical but if you ddos a server, the time it takes to handle a request become mesurable over a network, and if you know that the server is checking password character by character you can then know if the first characters of the password you tried are the rigth one because the server now takes longer to answer.
Aug 10, 2016 at 15:24 answer added John Smith timeline score: 2
Aug 10, 2016 at 14:35 answer added H. Idden timeline score: 14
Aug 10, 2016 at 10:59 comment added Bergi A DoS attack does bring up edge cases (a crash being a just-over-the-edge case), which should not but may reveal information not accessible otherwise.
Aug 10, 2016 at 9:43 answer added Rory Alsop timeline score: 85
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:30 review First posts
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:37
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:29 history edited Anders CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 32 characters in body
Aug 10, 2016 at 7:28 history asked KosugiNinja CC BY-SA 3.0