Skip to main content
43 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 30, 2013 at 9:09 comment added AviD Even though this question covers some very important issues, it's format is not a great fit for SE sites, since it's basically polling for a "list of X" which doesnt work well.
S May 30, 2013 at 9:07 history notice added AviD Historical significance
S May 30, 2013 at 9:07 history locked AviD
May 30, 2013 at 9:06 history reopened AviD
S May 30, 2013 at 9:06 history notice removed AviD
S May 30, 2013 at 9:06 history unlocked AviD
S May 30, 2013 at 9:06 history notice added AviD Historical significance
S May 30, 2013 at 9:06 history locked AviD
May 28, 2013 at 20:09 history closed Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'
Adi
TildalWave
Rory Alsop
not constructive
May 23, 2013 at 4:42 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 0
May 20, 2013 at 16:49 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 0
May 20, 2013 at 16:26 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 0
May 20, 2013 at 16:08 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 0
May 20, 2013 at 15:47 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 1
May 15, 2013 at 17:04 answer added John Deters timeline score: 3
Feb 8, 2013 at 13:43 comment added Maja Piechotka In most cases don't do cryptography if you think you don't need to ready "don't do" list (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect) - Dave was sure his implementation was secure.
Jan 3, 2013 at 14:56 comment added makerofthings7 Related meta discussion: Clarification between "rolling your own cryptography" vs "implementing a standard"
Oct 17, 2012 at 14:57 answer added D.W. timeline score: 3
Sep 8, 2012 at 16:55 answer added Shane Hansen timeline score: 3
Sep 8, 2012 at 16:05 answer added Watson Ladd timeline score: 1
Sep 8, 2012 at 13:19 comment added Jason Starbuck Don't do cryptography if you need to read "don't do" lists. Ask a security engineer specializing in cryptography to help you. :)
Jun 25, 2012 at 11:46 answer added Chris Dale timeline score: 17
Apr 17, 2012 at 7:22 history wiki removed AviD
Sep 28, 2011 at 4:03 answer added curiousguy timeline score: 13
Feb 25, 2011 at 15:27 comment added anonymous Also, short and easy presentation from Colin Percival (tarsnap) : bsdcan.org/2010/schedule/attachments/135_crypto1hr.pdf
Feb 23, 2011 at 18:19 comment added makerofthings7 Even though an answer is accepted, do continue to add lessons learned. At the very least it will be educational.
Feb 21, 2011 at 17:25 vote accept makerofthings7
Feb 20, 2011 at 7:33 history edited makerofthings7 CC BY-SA 2.5
edited title
Feb 20, 2011 at 5:39 answer added D.W. timeline score: 13
Feb 20, 2011 at 5:29 answer added D.W. timeline score: 36
Feb 20, 2011 at 4:06 answer added D.W. timeline score: 29
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:52 answer added D.W. timeline score: 75
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:50 answer added D.W. timeline score: 20
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:48 answer added D.W. timeline score: 8
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:46 comment added D.W. The most common errors are not errors in the code, but rather misconceptions about how to use cryptography. In other words, the developer would probably make the same mistake in any language. Therefore, I recommend broadening the question so that it's not so focused on code; most errors are conceptual errors, not coding flaws.
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:44 answer added D.W. timeline score: 8
Feb 20, 2011 at 3:36 answer added D.W. timeline score: 47
Feb 19, 2011 at 23:16 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/39101084828053504
Feb 19, 2011 at 20:41 history edited makerofthings7 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 86 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Feb 19, 2011 at 20:28 history edited makerofthings7 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 38 characters in body; edited tags; edited title; added 180 characters in body; added 89 characters in body
Feb 19, 2011 at 20:11 answer added Alex Holst timeline score: 29
Feb 19, 2011 at 19:34 answer added makerofthings7 timeline score: 20
Feb 19, 2011 at 19:25 history asked makerofthings7 CC BY-SA 2.5