Timeline for In this case, does Virtualization gives more security?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2014 at 21:25 | answer | added | Lars Schotte | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Oct 18, 2013 at 8:27 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 18, 2013 at 8:27 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 10, 2013 at 21:22 | answer | added | Ohad Cohen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 10, 2013 at 9:53 | answer | added | paj28 | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Oct 10, 2013 at 6:45 | history | bounty started | gasko peter | ||
| S Oct 10, 2013 at 6:45 | history | notice added | gasko peter | Draw attention | |
| Oct 10, 2013 at 6:45 | history | edited | gasko peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 232 characters in body
|
| Oct 3, 2013 at 13:39 | history | edited | gasko peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 429 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 8:30 | comment | added | Matrix | If you are serious about securing your server, I recommend against using OpenBSD. Read allthatiswrong.wordpress.com/2010/01/20/… for more information. Properly used Grsecurity + SELinux make Linux much more secure than OpenBSD. | |
| S Oct 1, 2013 at 12:19 | history | suggested | Kerim Oguzcan Yenidunya |
added virtualization tag.
|
|
| Oct 1, 2013 at 12:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSecurity/status/385015523115012096 | ||
| Oct 1, 2013 at 11:34 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 1, 2013 at 12:19 | |||||
| Oct 1, 2013 at 11:26 | answer | added | Tom Leek | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 1, 2013 at 8:10 | comment | added | Rory Alsop♦ | this may sound awkward, but what is your threat model? For some scenarios virtualisation will improve security, for others it may weaken security. | |
| Oct 1, 2013 at 7:52 | history | asked | gasko peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |