Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with linux
Search options not deleted
user 62053
Securing Linux systems and applications; understanding Linux security features.
0
votes
What are the security implications of systemd compared to systemv init?
One security issue I just noticed. On other init systems based on scripts, you will call the isolation as part of a script, ideally with set -e and pipefail etc if you are caring about security.
In th …
- 283
1
vote
0
answers
34
views
Was Unpriviledged User Namespaces exploited since it started to default to YES?
We had good discussions about it being safe or not five years ago, and it was defaulted to yes on the kernel way over 3 years ago (with a note calling anyone security conscious who disable it as paran …
- 283