131

I've seen a lot of people talk about how to pentest and how NOT to get caught during engagements but have a hard time finding "How to behave when caught during a Red Team engagement".

Red Teams are to simulate adversaries attacking systems. Many actions can't be done (or at least very hard to) with just some computers and Red Teams often have to go on-site and break in (legally). What I've seen so far is people succeeding in not getting caught. However, I haven't seen anyone talk about what to do when caught. It may just be some suspicion or even being chased by security (possibly armed).

In cases where a Red Teamer is caught during an engagement, what should he/she do?

  • Say "I'm a security tester. You've caught me so I'll just leave."
  • Run away like a criminal with their stolen data (which sounds fun but dangerous) to be more like an actual criminal attacker
  • Contact the employer to report it and get a "just continue" pass
  • Quietly come along for some possible interrogation (I think this would be the safest)

Update: I've made another question here which covers the 3rd parties not discussed in this question.

7
  • 112
    You should have proof that your actions are authorized.
    – Overmind
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 11:59
  • 112
    This should have been defined in the engagement scope ...
    – schroeder
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 12:16
  • 5
    I'm only a student with no real experience in real life Pentesting and have not seen examples of real engagements so I don't know what may be stated in the scope regarding this Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 13:06
  • 10
    Tinkersec likes to tell some good stories about this. Here's one. There are other, but I'll let readers go down this rabbit hole themselves.
    – kojiro
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 23:50
  • 16
    Worth listing the recent Coalfire Security incident which has the pen testers facing misdemeanor charges. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6540700/… So make sure the people hiring sort out jurisdictional issues first.
    – Gary
    Commented Nov 12, 2019 at 2:15

2 Answers 2

191

Always have your slip with you!

This is the golden rule of Red Teaming! If you don't have your Permission to Attack with you, it's like driving without a driver's license. That said, if you are caught during an engagement, I recommend the following:

  1. Present a forged Permission to Attack. This way, you can see if criminals could possibly trick a security guard to letting them do their thing with a fake Permission to Attack.

  2. Present the real Permission to Attack. If a guard has not bought your fake slip, then it's time to hand in the real slip. If the guard believes you, it's time to pick up and leave the perimeter. A real attacker would have been stopped at this point. If the guard did not believe you, ask them kindly to talk to their supervisor. If they insist on not believing you and calling the police, so be it. You're not a criminal, so don't worry about it.

  3. Follow the police's orders. They'll take you with them to the station, where you can explain to the police that you are part of a Red Team Engagement, and that you have a permission to break into the company. They will double-check that, calling whoever is listed as the person who signed your Permission to Attack. In the happy case, they'll pick up the phone, explain that you are really hired to do that, and you'll be free to go.

    In the not-so-happy case, they won't pick up because it's 4 in the morning and their phone has no battery. Should this happen, you will probably spend the night in the police station. Worse things have happened. Call your employer in the morning, and they will reach the contact at the customer's company for you.

What about the other options?

Saying "I'm a security researcher. You've caught me so I'll just leave"

will not be very helpful. In the eyes of a security guard, you're a criminal, caught in the middle of a crime. You will not have the choice of "just leaving".

Run away like a criminal.

A very bad idea. Probably the worst you could do. If the guard calls the police (they likely will), the costs could rise quite a lot and it would not make the customer happy to know they now have to pay the police for an unnecessary manhunt as well. However, you should absolutely include in your report if getting away from the perimeter after getting caught would have been a trivial effort or not.

Contact the employer to get a "Just continue pass".

That would miss the point of a Red Team Engagement. Once you have a "Just continue"-pass, you are not simulating how a real attacker would act. You would just go through the stuff of the company with their permission.

1
  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Rory Alsop
    Commented Nov 16, 2019 at 14:29
52

There's a flip side: what to do if you discover a physical pentester. When I was working at a bank, I happened to notice the iconic metasploit cli welcome banner flash up for a second on a desktop in the middle of a cube farm.

Physical pentesters are a part of life at a bank, and the rules of engagement are very clear beforehand. There are rules and procedures for both parties if someone notices a pentester. This keeps everyone safe.

Because imagine the situation: if metasploit is running, all it would take would be the attacker running a pre-made script and it could be "game over" for the bank. If you see the banner, it is likely already too late. That means that that person's fingers need to be off that keyboard and the network cord pulled/wifi turned off as soon as possible. Like, immediately. That means rough physical interaction. Not waiting for security to arrive. And that's a safety problem.

It turns out that in this case, the pentester messed up by exposing himself like that and the engagement would have been prematurely ended, but by following protocols, the engagement continued under the defined scope and everyone was safe. The test was not about being able to get in, but to simulate a malicious insider.

13
  • 6
    @MechMK1 or at least getting your body in between the device and the other person.
    – schroeder
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 14:56
  • 12
    @MechMK1 probably no force at all, since the company can only authorize activities that it itself is allowed to do - e.g. the company can authorize a pentester to access its servers; the company can delegate a pentester as much authority as it itself has for security tests of third-party cloud systems and buildings rented from third parties (which may likely have some restrictions) and it can't authorize the pentester to use force against its employees or hack their home computers or gmail accounts since the company itself isn't authorized to do that.
    – Peteris
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 20:17
  • 32
    @schroeder standard procedures in most companies would not expect (or even allow) office employees to physically assault suspected intruders, they'd be expected to just call security even if it means that the attacker will complete some activity or get away. I mean, bank tellers usually are under strict orders to not resist robbers claiming to be armed, as the robbery loss is considered lower than the risk of costly injuries. A policy of rough physical interaction from employees who see what they think is metasploit on a screen of some person would be quite risky from liability perspective.
    – Peteris
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 20:21
  • 6
    @schroeder sure, my point probably is that if I was the HR manager approving policies, then I wouldn't trust random untrained office employees to not cross the line between assault and not assault, and the liability risk of some physical altercation happening "according to company policy, doing what the company asked of us" because of some misunderstanding (probably with no relation to a pentest) can easily be a carreer-limiting move for anyone signing off on that policy, so the default CYA measure is to prohibit it.
    – Peteris
    Commented Nov 11, 2019 at 20:54
  • 29
    Some of y'all must have really liked your employers. There is no office I've worked at where I would have considered it worth it to physically insert my body between an assumed attacker and his target. If they hire me to be a security guard, then I'll do security. If they're hiring me as a programmer, I'll call security and that's it, *period*. Commented Nov 12, 2019 at 19:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .